Choice is a powerful thing

Judges.  They are all around us and we are also one.

We might like to think that we can affect, influence, and even control all of the stuff around us--and we can to a large part--but sometimes we can't have as much control and influence as we'd ultimately prefer.

Decisions start and stop all things.  Decisions can come from within us or outside of us.  In this way, there are two competing forces: us and them.  Everything boils down to decisions and it is decisions that are the things that are affecting and creating the workflows, processes, and policies that surround us.  Decisions are the things that ultimately set our course of action in life.

When a leader or person in a powerful position above us or in relation to our project makes a decision, all things are put into motion and dependent upon that decision or opinion.  As project managers we have to be very aware of the decisions and opinions being made around us and make our own decisions of how we'd like to react given them. 

There are several ways we can decide to treat these decisions and opinions being made around us: A) we can work in compliance and agreement with them, B) we can work around or be ignorant to them, or C) we can directly against and in combat of that decision. 

Working in compliance and agreement of the decisions is the preferred--don't rock the boat--way of doing things.  It's the easiest and probably the most effective.

Working around or ignoring decisions is another form of compliance but it is a bit more subversive.  It is passive-aggressive to know but not necessary heed the decision.

The third type of behavior in relationship with respect to a decision is total war against that decision.  When we get into this mode, we do not agree with the decision and will do everything in our power to fight or change it.

We all want control and on a day by day basis we make our own decisions about the decisions and opinions that are taking place around us and set our own path in the maze.

Unscrew screwed situations

Don't just be any tool, be a screwdriver.  Be the one that can drive
change in one direction or another and try to make sure
it's positive change that people want.

I'm frequently brought into organizations to unscrew screwed situations.  What I do is to figure out what's going on (the situation), try to talk to all parties and sides (get info), look at all of the pieces and parts and systems (analyze), and then look at the market and objectives and fact and make decisions and recommendations and plans to help steer the organization(s) into a clearer light (lead).

Doing this is an art and science, and a risky, difficult one at that.  To do it successfully, you have to be really careful of the people and goals and get everyone thinking and looking in the same direction.  Have you have to identify key bottlenecks and remove them one by one until you can see out.  Communicating effectively up during this time is also difficult, yet critically important.

Dive into organizations and find out where they are most screwed up.  Be the change that is required to correct the problem and point it into the direction that you believe.

Technology's Impact on Politics

In preparing for the April 16 MIT Enterprise Forum Event on "Technology's Impact on Politics" at the Bellevue Hyatt, I've been doing some calling-around and a little research. Here are some thoughts based on my conversations. I'd like to know your thoughts, too. Some of the fun organizations that I've contacted are http://www.technet.org/ and http://blueutopia.com/.

I keep thinking that offering "political infrastructure" as a service may be valuable. I see that being delivered as a hodge-podge of already-existing technologies rolled into a service. ie I don't think there's any reason to re-invent the wheel here. Maybe there's unfulfilled need in the market for campaign service companies where candidates or causes outsource their whole campaign to achieve their goals through crowds. But do businesses have incentive to deliver services specialized in politics only? I kinda doubt it. Politics is obviously a very cyclical business, which is a downside for businesses. But I do think that there is a ton that can be learned from observing the way the political process works. ie how do communications, campaigns, and groups form and work together to achieve the goals of the candidate or cause? Maybe the political process is a model for businesses to learn from as they discover how they, too, can use technology to build their brand and achieve their goals.